Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Next two weeks crucial for agency budgets
Monday - 11/14/2011, 7:19am EST
By Michael O'Connell
Federal News Radio
The supercommittee's Nov. 23 deadline to find more than $1 trillion in cuts to federal spending is quickly approaching. If an agreement isn't reached, automatic across-the-board cuts — half from civilian agencies and half from the Defense Department — go into effect.
Steve Bell, the senior director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said despite the apparent impasse, he suspects an agreement will be reached by the supercommittee.
"My suspicion is, with only nine days to go, that we will get something cobbled together that saves $1.2 trillion against the baseline, as the Congressional Budget Office will score it," Bell told the Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Amy Morris. "And, we will not get, in the short term, any real changes in the Medicare, Medicaid and the other health care programs that are driving the debt."
Bell served as head of the Senate Budget Committee from 1981 to 1986. He said that the current budget debate is more vitriolic and partisan than any he has seen.
"There is a real desire to get a big deal but there is the problem of trying to get a majority of both caucuses in the House and the Senate to go along with a big deal. It's a situation where you've got 12 folks who want to get something done and you've got 523 folks who aren't so sure."
While the deficit debate remains mired in politics, legislators will have to face another poltical reality — the current continuing resolution funding the government is set to expire on Friday.
"Whatever you decide to do with the continuing resolution at the close of business this Friday, whether it's another continuing resolution for a short term, which is what I think it will be, that will have some impact on the baseline that the joint select committee has to cut from," Bell said. "So, you have to get one in place, namely, what is the real baseline? That'll be determined by the nature of the continuing resolution. And after you do that, and you decide if you want to cut some more money from discretionary appropriate accounts, then you will have to figure out what the new spending baseline going forward would be."
Feds dealing with proposed cuts
For federal workers experiencing a degree of anxiety about what possible budget cuts might mean for them, Bell said it's not going to get better anytime soon.
"This kind of uncertainty is going to continue for some time. This is not going to be the final word. We still have 2012 to go, where all sorts of things might emerge."
When asked how the business of government will still get done with less funds and potentially fewer employees, Bell said there is a bit of cognitive dissonance going on in Congress.
"I think right now most people in the federal government, in the political branch, are saying things which are polar opposite but they seem reasonably comfortable. Most of them don't know how government works, to be very blunt with you. They don't realize what you're talking about when you say, 'Let's cut SEC, let's cut transportation and safety programs in the airlines.' I think there is this feeling that most of what they know is, 'there is waste, fraud and abuse, and government is too big.' But they have no idea what government does or what will happen when you decide to cut back let's say 5 or 6 percent of the FTEs [fulltime equivalents] for various agencies. It'll get worse as far as inefficiency but it won't be the fault of the agencies."
Late last week, the Democratic members of the supercommittee proposed an additional $200 billion in cuts in discretionary defense spending and an additional $200 billion in cuts from non-defense discretionary spending. These proposals are on top of the approximately $917 billion in cuts that are already in the baseline, which then brings the total cuts to $1.3 trillion over the next 10 years.
In addition, committee members are engaged in what Bell described as a big fight over what's really been offered in revenue.
"The latest Democratic offer is that we'll get $350 billion now and then we'll have instructions to the committees to find another $650 billion sometime over the next year," he said. "And that's a total of $1 trillion. So, about $2.3 trillion is the latest Democratic proposal." Republicans have responded with substantially more spending cuts.