Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
DoD gives vendors 20-day notice of insourcing of jobs
Thursday - 10/31/2013, 2:22pm EDT
DoD issued an interim rule with a request for comments in today's Federal Register implementing section 938 of the fiscal 2012 Defense Authorization Act.
"The notification will summarize why the services are being insourced and must be coordinated with the component's insourcing program official," the interim rule stated. "A copy of the notification will be provided to the congressional Defense committees."
DoD also issued a policy in January to implement the provision in the law. It detailed three justifications for insourcing positions:
- If the jobs are considered inherently governmental functions.
- If the positions work closely with inherently governmental functions and that
are critical in nature.
- If the decisions are solely based on cost savings based on a cost-analysis.
The Government Accountability Office found in February 2012 DoD brought only 17,000 positions back in house in 2011. The Army accounted for 42 percent of those positions.
DoD eventually slowed down the insourcing of jobs as it found the savings didn't materialize like some initially predicted.
GAO issued a recent report in September where it found DoD has improved its cost estimating methodology, but still fell short in how they estimated the cost of training and did not include the reserve or national guard components.