Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Will insider-trading bill chill dialogue between contractors, government?
Thursday - 2/23/2012, 6:08pm EST
The Acquisition Reform Working Group, which is made up of some of the top industry groups, has pointed to a particular provision in the proposed bill, section 17, which would require "political intelligence consultants" to register under the Lobby Disclosure Act.
"The intent of the original bill to eliminate insider trading by legislative and executive branch officials is an understandable concern,"ARWG wrote in a letter to lawmakers. "Section 17 of the bill, however, goes beyond this intent and will have costly, unintended, and non-productive impacts on the reasonable exchange of information necessary to improve the functioning of the federal acquisition process."
The group said the bill's language is sufficiently vague that it could result in "broad reporting requirements for federal government contractors (and others) simply for engaging in the regular and necessary day-to-day communications with their federal customers," the ARWG letter states.
Trey Hodgkins, the senior vice president for National Security and Procurement Policy at TechAmerica, joined In Depth with Francis Rose to discuss the bill and how it could affect the relationship between the government's acquisition personnel and industry.