Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Trust is a critical factor in the relationship between federal managers and employees. Without it, whistleblowers are retaliated against; minor Hatch Act violations receive severe punishments; and unsuitable employees are given security clearances. In our special report, Trust Redefined: Reconnecting Government and Its Employees, Federal News Radio explores what a lack of trust has created in government and what it will take to restore it.
Agency budget squeeze eroding trust between employees, management
Tuesday - 5/20/2014, 2:10am EDT
The Merit Systems Protection Board, which hears employees' appeals of adverse personnel actions, would know.
The small, 200-person agency was flooded with more than 32,000 claims from employees who contested their agency's decision to furlough them last year because of across-the-board sequestration cuts. All told, agencies furloughed more than 700,000 employees in 2013 for one to seven days, according to the Government Accountability Office.
Susan Tsui Grundmann, chair of the MSPB, said many employees said they filed appeals because they didn't trust managers were making the right spending decisions that could have fended off the need to furlough employees.
"One of the issues that keeps coming up is how the agency spends its money," she told Federal News Radio as part of the special report, Trust Redefined: Reconnecting Government and Its Employees.
Employees demanded to know whether the agency could have taken other actions besides furloughs to manage the cuts or whether managers had fairly determined which employees would be exempt from the furloughs.
Part of the problem is that too many employees felt left in the dark about the agency's decision-making process, she said, and that lack of transparency can often breed mistrust.
"When you thoroughly explain how decisions are made — such as sequestration, such as furloughs, such as hiring decisions — there is less of an appearance of favoritism and impropriety," Grundmann told Federal Drive hosts Tom Temin and Emily Kopp.
That's important "because perceptions can become reality," she added. "And perceptions can affect morale, and morale can affect agency performance."
Managers should strive to communicate more frequently with employees — "even the bad news," Grundmann said.
"To the extent that agencies are capable of explaining their decision-making process in plain English, repeatedly, that would be helpful," she said. "And, certainly, employees need to understand that the decisions to furlough them did not come from their first-line supervisors."
The budget turmoil of furloughs, sequestration and the government shutdown has left fractures in the federal workplace.
"Employees feel overwhelmed and that they're shouldering the burdens of the agency's spending decisions," Grundmann said.
But agency management is also still dealing with the fallout.
"They have to process the cases," she said. "They have to defend the cases and take the cases to hearings. So, yes, money might've been saved as a result of the furloughs, but in terms of people and workload, there are no winners here."
All of the furlough appeals are now in the hearing stage. As of March, about 1,600 decisions had been issued, none of them in favor of the employee filing the appeal.
MORE FROM THE SPECIAL REPORT, TRUST REDEFINED: