Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
DoD nominees face scrutiny over Pentagon plan to shrink compensation costs
Tuesday - 2/25/2014, 3:29pm EST
Just a day after Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel proposed reductions in military end-strength and shrinking compensation costs as part of next year's budget plan, a slate of nominees to lead key offices at the Pentagon faced congressional scrutiny.
Robert Work, nominated earlier this month by President Barack Obama to serve in the No. 2 slot at DoD, pledged to members of the Senate Armed Services Committee he would strive to improve the department's management and budget process.
But he faced tough questions about the department's proposals to trim the growth of military compensation and its management of major weapons programs.
Hagel aims to slow growth of compensation
Savings from personnel- and compensation-related costs figure heavily into Hagel's latest budget calculations.
That includes only a slight 1 percent pay raise for the second year in a row for military members. That's lower than the currently projected 1.8 percent pay hike that would otherwise take effect, committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) pointed out.
The Pentagon's fiscal 2015 budget will also include a one-year pay freeze for general and flag officers; a reduction in the growth of military housing allowances — eventually shifting down 95 percent of housing expenses from 100 percent currently covered; a gradual reduction in direct subsidies for commissaries; changes to TRICARE, including the addition of new out-of-pocket costs for retirees as well as family members of active-duty service members; and overall steep reductions in Army end strength.
Work said service members today enjoy compensation levels about 10 percent above their average civilian counterpart and that the reductions are necessary to maintain military readiness.
Pentagon leaders "are trying to signal that we want to compensate our men and women for everything that they do for our nation but we need to slow down the growth of personnel compensation so that we can spend more money on readiness and modernization," Work said. "There is a direct link."
'Tradeoff' between compensation costs, readiness
The costs of military compensation account for about a third of DoD's budget, said Mike McCord, who worked as a professional staff member on the committee for more than 21 years and has been nominated to succeed Robert Hale as DoD comptroller. When combined with civilian compensation costs, that grows to about half.
"The chiefs wrestle with this when we go through our budget deliberations. ... They very directly feel, as the people who have to train and equip the force for today as well as tomorrow, that there's a direct trade off between military capability and being able to control our compensation costs," McCord said.
If confirmed, McCord faces the task of making sure the department has its entire consolidated financial statement ready to be reviewed by auditors by fiscal 2017 as well as preparing for a scaled-down review of the department's statement of budgetary resources by the end of the current fiscal year.
DoD remains the only federal department that hasn't passed a full audit, a requirement mandated for all agencies by Congress in 1990.
"So you understand there might be a slight germ of doubt, a cynicism about this latest year we're going to have a clean audit?" said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)
Also fielding questions from members of the committee, were Christine Wormuth, nominated to be undersecretary of Defense for policy; Brian McKeon, nominated to serve as principal deputy for policy; David Shear, nominated to be serve as assistant secretary of Defense for Asian and Pacific security affairs; and Eric Rosenbloch, nominated to be assistance secretary of Defense for homeland defense.
Budget caps LCS buys at 32
Many of the department's large-scale acquisition programs also came under scrutiny during the hearing, including the troubled Littoral Combat Ship.
The department's proposed budget for fiscal 2015 calls for capping the number of ships at 32 — 20 fewer than originally planned for — a sign many defense analysts see a potential death knell for the program.
"I think this is very normal with Navy shipbuilding," said Work, who served as the undersecretary of the Navy up until early last year. "We build in flights."
After filling that initial order, DoD could consider "follow-on" ships, such as a modified LCS or a domestic or foreign-designed replacement, he added.
"You think it's normal?" McCain said. "You think it's normal — the cost overruns associated with this ship? The fact that we don't even know what the mission is?"
Work acknowledged up until 2009, the year he arrived at the Navy, there were significant overruns and the program "almost imploded."