Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
House intel chairman suggests U.S., Israel not behind cyber attacks on Iran
Friday - 6/22/2012, 5:32am EDT
When it comes to cyber attacks against Iran, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said you shouldn't believe everything you read.
Rogers was asked at a conference Thursday to respond to recent media reports that the U.S. and Israel were behind the Stuxnet and Flame worms that targeted Iran's nuclear program.
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) (AP file photo)
Rogers was asked by reporters to clarify his remarks after the event held by Bloomberg and the Center for Security Policy, but refused to go into further detail. He said the United States does not use offensive cyber weapons against other countries for one main reason — our privately-owned networks aren't secure enough to withstand a potential cyber retaliation.
"I was always taught growing up in the playground, don't throw the first punch unless you're willing to take that fight all the way to the end. I'd be very cautious about using any offensive capability until our networks in America are better protected," Rogers said. "Ninety-five percent of those networks out there are private networks. That's part of the problem. If you're going to offensively do something you better be darn careful that those networks can protect themselves and, I would argue today, that that's probably not a good idea."
Rogers said better information sharing between companies and between the public and private sector would go a long way toward closing off those network vulnerabilities.