Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Federal employees who came into government after Jan. 1, 1984 were part of a grand experiment. Could the government transition to a private-sector-like retirement system? The answer, 25 years after the creation of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), is a resounding yes. FERS, according to many experts, has lived up to the expectation of providing federal employees a three-piece retirement plan: a small defined pension, Social Security and a 401k-like investment opportunity in the Thrift Savings Plan. In our special report, FERS: 25 Years Later, Federal News Radio explores whether moving from the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) to FERS was a success and how FERS has evolved over the last quarter century.
Couple navigates FERS-CSRS retirement divide
Thursday - 12/13/2012, 6:12pm EST
As part of the special series, FERS: 25 Years Later, Federal News Radio welcomed to its studios a retired federal couple, Neil Schiff and Linda Habenstreit, who represent the federal retirement divide. They joined The Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Emily Kopp Thursday to talk about their retirement experience.
When Schiff retired from the FBI's Office of Public Affairs, he was a FERS enrollee. His wife, a long-time public affairs specialist in the Agriculture Department's Foreign Agricultural Service, was covered by CSRS.
Neal Schiff and Linda Habenstreit in the Federal News Radio studios.
Though they both began their federal careers before the modern FERS era, Schiff left government service for a job in the private sector in the early 1980s, returning after the new system went into effect. And because he had fewer than five years of creditable service, he was automatically funneled into the new system.
"It would have been nice (to return to CSRS), but as it turned out, I was put in FERS," Schiff said. "It's fine. It's worked out very well."
He said he thinks CSRS offers a better overall plan, but he understands why the promise of cost-savings led the government to create and adopt FERS for new employees.
Despite whatever confusion may arise because each half of the couple draws different retirement benefits, Habenstreit stressed that both consider themselves fortunate.
"We're very lucky to have worked in the federal government and have good annuities. They're both good programs," she said, citing the options they offer employees. For example, even though she is in CSRS, Habenstreit has made contributions to the TSP, she explained.
CSRS employees are able to make contributions to the retirement-savings accounts but are not eligible for a matching contribution from their agencies.
More from FERS: 25 Years Later