Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Your own personal Rorschach test
Monday - 12/16/2013, 2:00am EST
Personality-wise are you usually happy or sad? Would friends and family describe you as an upper, or a downer? Cheerful or morose? Do you trust most people, or do you wonder what they are really up to? Were you in an eight-year funk under President Bush? Or has your life been on hold since the last two presidential elections?
Take this Rorschach Test. Do you see Beyonce or Nancy Pelosi? Is it George Clooney or Gary Busey?
Here's another test:
What do you think about the last-minute budget deal? The one that apparently delays layoffs or furloughs for two years. The one that headed off another government shutdown. The deal that eases some of the mandatory cuts that were to be imposed by sequestration. That one.
The way you view the Ryan-Murray (or Murray-Ryan) budget deal may tell a lot about whether you are a glass-half-full or glass-half-empty person.
National Public Radio said the budget deal infuriated "liberal Democrats and arch conservatives."
Groups that represent feds and retirees, who oppose any cuts in benefits, protested the deal. But secretly they had to be high-fiving each other because it could have been so much worse.
None of the changes called for in the budget impact a single current federal worker.
The extra 1.3 percent payment employees will make to the FERS retirement plan applies only to people who aren't yet employees. Feds on the payroll as of Dec. 31 will continue to pay at their current rate. Anyone hired afterward will contribute 4.4 percent to FERS.
Because of an earlier deal, feds hired this year under the FERS plan pay 3.1 percent toward their pensions. All other workers under FERS, about 98 percent of the total employees, will continue to pay only 0.8 percent.
Originally, the House GOP proposal was for a 5.4 percent contribution for all federal workers. The White House wanted worker contributions be raised by 1.2 percent.
The headline, the take-away for feds, is what is not in the Murray-Ryan budget deal. It did not include:
- The so-called chained CPI which, if enacted, would permanently
reduce future cost-of-living adjustments for retired federal and military
personnel and people getting Social Security. On last week's Your Turn radio show, National Association of Active and
Retired Federal Employees' Jessica Klement said if the chained CPI had been
approved it would, over a 25-year period in retirement, trim $48,000 from the
benefits of the average fed retired today. Most of them are under the more
generous CSRS plan. Incidentally, the chained CPI was also endorsed by the White
House and most House Republicans.
- A Republican proposal, also backed by the administration, to
eliminate the Social Security supplemental. That is a paymnent FERS workers get
if they retire before they are eligible for Social Security. That supplement is
worth several thousand dollars per early retiree.
- The budget didn't mention any change in the way retirement benefits are computed. For years, cost-cutters have proposed basing annuities on the employees highest five-year average salary, instead of the high-three formula under current law.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
Compiled by Jack Moore
The CIA spent five years and $20 million trying to train a cat, outfitted with hidden microphones and transmitters, to act as a sercret spy. However, during the first test mission — involving scoping out a supposed Soviet meeting place in a Washington, D.C., park — the spy cat was struck by a passing taxi and killed, thus ending the project.
(Source: Today I Found Out)
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
DHS morale problems linked to leadership
Former Secretary Tom Ridge told lawmakers the Homeland Security Department cannot build nor sustain a mission-focused culture with so many non-permanent positions.
Report: Women still face
'significant obstacles' in advancing federal careers
Women are still encountering enormous hurdles when it comes to advancing their careers in federal service. That's according to a report released today by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Is the budget deal the final word
on contractor compensation?
Tucked away inside the bipartisan budget deal announced with much fanfare this week is a proposal limiting the maximum level contractors can charge the government to pay the salaries of their top executives to nearly half of what it is currently. But it may not be the final word on the issue on the sticky issue of contractor compensation.