Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Lawmakers take on legislative process in fight against duplicative programs
Monday - 4/29/2013, 6:31pm EDT
Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), the ranking member of the committee, and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) introduced a bill Friday that would require the Congressional Research Service to analyze legislation and determine whether it would create new programs that duplicate existing ones.
"If individual members of the Senate fail to do the research to determine if their proposals are duplicative, this bill will ensure they receive that information," Coburn said in a release.
Earlier this month, the Government Accountability Office reported 17 areas of government overlap and duplication representing $95 billion in potential savings.
GAO has produced its annual report on duplicative federal programs for the past two years. But agencies have been slow to implement the recommendations. Of the 300 action items identified, agencies have fully addressed just 65 of them, according to GAO.
The annual duplication reports have also, so far, failed to galvanize Congress into action.
Coburn and Udall previously introduced a similar version of their bill in 2011 and 2012. But despite strong bipartisan backing, the measure failed to advance both times.
"All too often, Congress focuses on creating new programs and regulations instead of updating existing programs or abolishing those that have outlived their purpose," Udall said in a statement. "This bipartisan, common-sense bill will help eliminate duplicative programs and ensure that lawmakers formally analyze possible duplication when they draft a bill or resolution."
House members also seek rule changes
Coburn and Udall aren't the only lawmakers seeking to change legislative rules to cut back on overlapping programs.
Earlier this month, Reps. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) and Gary Peters (D-Mich.) introduced the Congressional Oversight to Start Taxpayer Savings — or COST Savings — resolution that would amend House rules to require committees of jurisdiction to hold oversight hearings on GAO's duplication report.
"Instead of letting that report gather dust, we are proposing that Congress hold hearings and vote on the suggestions in the GAO report," Gardner said in a statement.
Meanwhile, Peters introduced a separate measure designed to accelerate the process by which Congress reviews cost-savings recommendations included in the president's proposed budget.
The White House's budget request for fiscal 2014 included 215 proposals to cut or consolidate federal programs that could save the government more than $25 billion next year, alone, Office of Management and Budget Controller Danny Werfel estimated.