Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Agency officials tout progress on security clearances
Thursday - 6/21/2012, 7:51pm EDT
Agency officials from the Defense Department and the Office of Personnel Management, along with a handful of other agencies, cited significant improvements in both timeliness and accuracy in the security-clearance program at a hearing of the Senate Oversight and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management.
The hearing — the 15th on the security-clearance program since 2005 — was a far cry from previous ones on the program, which was once plagued by costly delays and a longstanding backlog.
Among the encouraging statistics presented:
- DoD cut the time it takes to process to an average of 46 days for 90 percent
of its initial clearances, well within a 60-day timeframe established by Congress.
That led the Government Accountability Office to remove the program from its high-
risk list last year, the first time GAO had ever done so for a defense-related
- DoD also drastically reduced the adjudication process, where a background
check is evaluated by agency reviewers to determine an applicant's fitness for a
particular job responsibility. Facing a mandate to adjudicate within 20 days, DoD
Deputy Chief Management Officer Elizabeth McGrath said DoD now does so in "a fleet
The department also has established several quality metrics for evaluating the quality of investigations.
- OPM — the agency responsible for 90 percent of initial background
investigations — made its way through a backlog GAO once estimated at
"Today, OPM's background investigation program's performance is strong, as demonstrated by years of providing timely and quality products to our customer agencies," said Merton Miller, the associate director of OPM's Federal Investigative Services. "We have no backlogs, are meeting timeliness mandates and have increased automation."
"The real challenge going forward will be to sustain the attention to this area and to enhance the efforts that have been put in place and to make sure ... there's not any potential for there to be slippage in any of the progress that's been achieved," Comptroller General Gene Dodaro, the head of GAO, told lawmakers in his opening statement.
Council, agency coordination drove reforms
The often-complex security-clearance process involves multiple agencies. DoD typically determines which personnel require access to classified information and, thus, must undergo checks. The Office of Personnel Management actually conducts the investigations.
When Congress approved the 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA), the average processing time for initial clearances was a torpid 265 days. IRTPA set milestones for reducing processing times.
GAO cited robust congressional oversight and the "committed leadership" of the Suitability and Security Clearance Performance Accountability Council, or PAC, as a key driver of the reforms.
"The advances DoD has made thus far in security clearance processing, timeliness and quality would not have been achieved without the dedication and top-down direction from the PAC," McGrath said in her prepared remarks.
For its part, DoD, the federal government's largest customer of security-clearance investigations, has played an active role in reform, she added.
"Not content to be a demanding customer, we have scoured our internal processes and standards for conducting adjudications and raised our game, vying for best-in- government timelines, while fortifying underlying quality assurance programs with improved guidance and enterprise-wide technological tools," McGrath said.
Reciprocity, technology remain issues
Among the issues still posing a challenge for agencies, however, is reciprocity. Agencies use background investigations for a variety of purposes — to determine suitability for a federal job or access to classified material, among others. But there is little coordination — or reciprocity — between the various systems.
Office of Management and Budget Controller Danny Werfel said OPM and the intelligence community have hammered out policy guidance and training standards for both agency investigators and adjudicators in effort to develop better coordination among agencies. Doing so could reduce overlap and duplicated efforts.
OPM has also taken great strides to leverage technology in the investigation process. Werfel told the committee more than 99 percent of clearance applications OPM receives are submitted electronically using a system called e-Qip. The PAC is now working to replicate that system in the intelligence community, he said.
However, OPM is still saddled with a paper-based filing system because a few agencies do not file electronically.
"I think it's just a lot of elbow grease that's required on our behalf to go in and make sure that the agencies are focused on taking those critical steps to deploy these modernized solutions," Werfel said. "I think it's pretty clear what the results are. I think it's about just pushing to make sure it's a priority," he said.