Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Plan to prevent sequestration unlikely before election
Wednesday - 1/18/2012, 11:13am EST
But any deal to avoid sequestration probably won't happen anytime before the election, said Erik Wasson, reporter for the Hill newspaper, said in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin.
"The election and the election will determine what the dynamics will be," Wasson said.
The first of the sequestration cuts are really the same overall discretionary spending level but with a shift in cuts to defense and national security, Wasson said.
"There really is an onus on defense hawks to try to come up with a solution," he said.
One of those defense hawks is Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), who represents a state with a heavy defense aviation presence, Wasson said.
Dicks said this week he expects a deal to prevent the sequestration process, but told the Seattle Times the plan could come after the election.
However, if GOP presidential Mitt Romney "turn up pressure" on President Obama about the planned cuts to defense, "they may be more impetus to resolve that," Wasson said.