Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Congress passes bill to honor fallen feds
Friday - 12/9/2011, 7:50pm EST
"I'm proud that our nation values service and sacrifice. A life can never be repaid but it can be honored; this bill ensures that," said Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.), who sponsored the House version.
Over the past 20 years, nearly 3,000 federal civilian employees have died in the line of duty as the result of crime, terrorism, natural disasters or other "extraordinary" events, but the government lacked a standard policy for honoring them. While some agencies chose to give American flags to their family members, others did not. The bill clears up the confusion by allowing the Office of Personnel Management to standardize procedures.
The tribute stands in contrast to some lawmakers' recent calls to extend a freeze on federal employees' pay.
"At a time when federal employees are increasingly under attack, this is good government legislation that appropriately honors fallen federal employees for the work they do for this country," said Senior Executives Association President Carol Bonosaro in a written statement. "Federal employees serve as law enforcement officers, are stationed overseas in combat zones and unstable conditions, and are killed in acts of terrorism directly aimed at the federal government, such as the Oklahoma City bombings and the IRS incident in Austin, Texas."
The bill passed with unanimous support in both chambers after satisfying the American Legion's concerns that it gave agency heads too much power to decide who may be eligible.