Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
What conflict of interest? How power blinds us to our flaws
Tuesday - 10/19/2010, 3:20pm EDT
Journal readers commented that they thought the staffers were being disingenuous when they said they weren't doing anything wrong, even when trading in and out of stocks that stood to benefit from government actions that the staffers oversaw.
A psychologist from Yale University told the Journal that people are not good at being objective about their own conflicts of interest.
A professor from Northwestern University told the Journal that power makes people "feel both psychologically invincible and psychologically invisible."
One solution for the conflict of interest on Capitol Hill is to increase how often staffers' trades are disclosed. Currently, disclosure is required once a year.
Other options: "Ban trading outright, subject all trades to independent review before they can be executed or require members of Congress to put their assets in blind trusts," according to the article.
This story is part of our daily DorobekINSIDER Must Reads. Be sure to check out the full list of stories.