Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Senator sues OPM over health care regulations
Monday - 1/6/2014, 2:56pm EST
Under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, lawmakers and their staffs were booted from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), under which the government typically kicks in about three-quarters of the cost of federal employees' premiums. They are also required to purchase health insurance on the federal exchange.
However, even though their health coverage has migrated to the Affordable Care Act's small-business exchange, lawmakers and their staffs are still eligible for the government's premium contribution, according to a final OPM rule published in October.
Johnson contends OPM's regulations run counter to the health care law as written and amount to "special treatment" for members of Congress.
"I think it's just a basic issue of fairness," Johnson said at a Capitol Hill press conference announcing the lawsuit. "I really do believe the American people expect — and they have every right to expect — that members of Congress, the political class here in Washington, should be fully subject to all of the rules, all of the laws that Congress imposes on the rest of America. And that is not the case with the health care law and, particularly, with this Office of Personnel Management ruling."
Johnson's lawsuit draws criticism
Johnson filed his lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. OPM referred comment on the lawsuit to the Justice Department, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Johnson's proposal has already drawn sharp criticism, from other lawmakers, notably Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, a fellow Wisconsin Republican.
Sensenbrenner said the government contribution for lawmakers' heath coverage is akin to the contributions that most private-sector employees receive from their employer-sponsored health coverage.
"Success in the suit will mean that Congress will lose some of its best staff and will be staffed primarily by recent college graduates who are still on their parents' insurance," he said in a statement.
This isn't the first time political controversy has swirled around lawmakers' health options. During the 16-day government shutdown in October, one of the Republican measures introduced to reopen the government would have nixed the government contribution for lawmakers and their staff members. The House overwhelmingly approved the measure, but it was handily rejected by the Senate.
Earlier, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) blocked a vote on confirming Archuleta to head the personnel office until the agency clarified how lawmakers and their staff would be treated under the health care law. Coburn lifted the hold on her nomination after the agency issued draft regulations in August.