Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
GOP sequestration plan calls for reducing federal workforce
Wednesday - 2/6/2013, 4:40pm EST
The bill, introduced by Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) uses the $85 billion in savings from the workforce reductions to avert the sequestration cuts for both Defense and civilian agencies.
Under McKeon and Ayotte's plan, federal agencies would be limited to replacing only one employee for every three that leave federal service. The hiring restrictions, which would be applied at the agency level (not within agency components) aims to give the Defense Department more flexibilty, according to a release from Ayotte's office, and could be waived for national security reasons.
The plan also includes a measure freezing congressional pay.
The Republican lawmakers, paraphrasing comments from Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other DoD officials, pointed to the harmful effects of sequestration on Pentagon spending.
"Frankly, our defense should not be used as a bargaining chip," Ayotte said.
The proposal is similar to a bill McKeon introduced last year — the Down Payment to Protect National Security Act.
McKeon said the current GOP alternative would be "as painless as possible to protect our troops."
The Republican lawmakers denounced President Barack Obama's proposal to delay sequestration with a short-term deficit deal that includes a combination of spending cuts and more taxes.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, called Obama's proposal a "nonstarter."
Unions, Democrats decry 'unfair' cuts
Congressional Democrats and federal-employee unions panned the Republican proposal.
"It is simply unfair and unwise to target America's public servants after they have already accepted a two-year pay freeze, an increased pension contribution, and a reduction and delay of a cost-of-living-adjustment this year," said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) in a statement.
Employee groups estimate that, so far, those changes to federal pay and benefits have garnered $103 billion in deficit savings.
Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.), who represents many federal workers in his district, said the latest Republican plan is an attempt "to place the brunt of deficit reduction on the backs of our federal workforce. ... It is time for Congress to find a comprehensive deficit plan that asks others to pay their fair share."
Many agencies are already facing dwindling staff numbers, said National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley whose union represents some 150,000 federal employees. The Internal Revenue Service has shed about 5,000 jobs since 2011, she said.
"Everyone agrees that sequestration is terrible policy," Kelley said in a statement. "Plans to implement it on March 1 should be abandoned, but doing so with a 10 percent reduction in the federal workforce is foolhardy and would result in short staffing that could last for a decade."
Congress has already delayed the onset of the cuts — from January to March — as part of a broader "fiscal cliff" deal.