Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
GAO: Agencies lack risk management in service contracts
Monday - 1/9/2012, 8:21pm EST
Federal News Radio
Service contracts now make up half of all federal contracts — the result of a 44 percent increase over the past five years. But this rapid rise has led the Government Accountability Office to issue a warning sign of sorts.
Professional- and management-support service contracting obligations at civilian agencies. (GAO chart)
"Many of these services increase the risk that contractors may inappropriately influence the government's authority, control and accountability for inherently governmental decisions," GAO found in its latest report on managing service contracts.
John Hutton, the director of acquisition and sourcing management issues at GAO, joined In Depth with Francis Rose to discuss the watchdog agency's latest report.
In the report, GAO reviewed five agencies:
- Homeland Security Department
- Transportation Department
- Housing and Urban Development Department
- U.S. Agency for International Development
- National Science Foundation
The issue boils down to definitions of "inherently governmental," as so many acquisition issues do. The difference between a contractor closely supporting the government and actually performing a job intended to be done by the government is a "very fine distinction," Hutton said.
For example, he said, providing acquisition support or budget analyses, are examples of work that while not inherently governmental, are "closely supporting," he added. "And that's where the risk, I think, presents itself: Does the government have the capacity, does it have the good understanding, that in those situations, they're considering the risks and taking appropriate action?"