Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Barlow Herget Commentary
Barlow Herget is a commentator and host on State Government Radio at Curtis Media. He has been a commentator on UNC public radio and an instructor in continuing education at Duke University. Herget was a Nieman Fellow ('70) at Harvard University, has worked for the Daily Press of Paragould, Ark., the Detroit Free Press, and the News & Observer of Raleigh. His articles have appeared in The Atlantic, The New York Times and numerous other publications. Contact him by email.
Monday - 3/21/2011, 11:28am EDT
An engineer familiar with Japan and construction in earthquake zones said that no country could respond better to such a disaster than the Japanese. Their culture makes looting in such a catastrophe unthinkable, and the orderliness of the people patiently waiting in line for water and food and gasoline is striking.
Japanese officials already are looking at the damage to learn what can be done differently to lessen such devastation in the future. Americans should get out their notebooks, too, because there are at least four big lessons they can learn.
First, there are some natural disasters that are going to be terrible no matter what you do. They cannot be prevented, avoided, or halted. They're going to happen.
Second, the ongoing nightmare of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant can be instructive. The plant is near the coast where the earthquake and tsunami hit. Engineers and designers considered damages from an earthquake and installed a set of generators that continued cooling the reactors when the main power grid failed.
They did not anticipate the great tsunami. The wave killed the generators, hence the frantic effort to cool the superheated radioactive rods before they cause a meltdown. The lesson here is not to build power plants so close to the ocean.
The Atlantic Ocean has not been as prone to tidal waves as the Pacific. But the East and Gulf coasts are very prone - annually - to powerful hurricanes that can churn up large floods and tidal flooding. Power plants near the ocean, on any coast, could be too risky.
We are going to need more nuclear power, and America's power companies are drawing up plans right now. The Japanese experience certainly will curb the enthusiasm, and it offers a third lesson: what to do about the dangerous threat posed by spent nuclear fuel.
The disposal of nuclear waste has never been resolved, mostly because of politics. Most such fuel is not at the bottom of the ocean but on nuclear power plant sites. Yes, that close. One of Japan's newest and most alarming problems at Fukushima Daiichi is keeping the spent fuel rods cool. The United States must find a permanent, safe place to dispose of nuclear waste.
Fourth, Japan's Prime Minister Naoto Kan said the rebuilding of his country will be its greatest challenge since World War II. This will require massive spending, especially on basic infrastructure such as bridges, roads, railroads, power grids and buildings such as airports. In short, a large economic stimulus program.
Japan will ask its people to share in these expenses, and there likely will be higher taxes, especially for those who can afford them. If this stimulus pumps up the stagnate Japanese economy, it will be a valuable lesson, indeed.