Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Dude, R U essential or expendable?
Tuesday - 1/15/2013, 2:00am EST
If you have an unemployed or underemployed friend who is a risk-taker and adrenaline junkie or just bored with the same-old-same-old, tell him or her to get a government job.
Thanks to increasingly nasty partisan political fighting in Washington, government employment — once considered by the public to be the ultimate safe haven — is suddenly the place to be if you want chills and thrills. Every day people have the emotional equivalent of being shot out of a cannon into a den of lions, tigers or bears.
For the last six months of 2012, feds sweated as they, and the rest of the country, crawled toward the fiscal cliff. Many special-interest groups and bad-news-is-good-news media types predicted gloom and doom if an agreement on spending cuts and taxes was not reached. Congress and the White House cut a last minute deal — heavy on taxes, pretty quiet on spending cuts — and that was that. But not for long...
Coming up is another possible calamity in mid-February when the debt ceiling limit must be raised or Uncle Sam defaults. In the past, the issue has been as much political as financial. The party controlling the White House says do it, and the opposition in the House and Senate balk. And nothing seems to have changed. Republican legislators did it to Democratic presidents. Democratic legislators did it to Republican presidents. When President George W. Bush asked Congress to raise the ceiling most Democrats, including then Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) voted against it. He later said it was a political vote for negotiating purposes. Since moving up and into the White House, he has said he will not negotiate this time.
Among those caught in the middle are federal workers who face the very real prospect of being locked out unless they are considered super-essential. The definition of workers who are considered "emergency" or "mission critical" or "essential" will become increasingly important as we stumble toward the next politician-made crisis.
Much of the attention has focused on what the Defense Department, the largest federal operation, will do if sequestration hits in March when stopgap budget measures for most federal agencies expire. The Pentagon plan calls for a hiring freeze, layoffs of temps and tougher contract rules. But there is a lot more to the federal government than the defense establishment.
Special-interest groups continue to warn about closures that could slow transportation, curtail imports and cripple the economy. Other than that, no problem.
The question is if there is a shutdown can/will the FAA exempt air-traffic controllers? Limiting flights into New York, Chicago, Dallas or Atlanta could back up the entire system. Will Social Security tell claims processors and check-issuers to stand down? Will the IRS say sorry-about-that-refund? Will FBI agents be told to go home and keep current by watching "Criminal Minds?"
If the past is prologue, the politicians will run it to the end. Then either raise the limit (which they usually do) or not. A real possibility.
Once we get past that one, there is the sequestration monster to follow.
Meantime, check with your boss to find out whether you are essential or expendable. And let us know what would happen if you and your agency took a forced time out.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Women consider men with brown eyes more trustworthy, according to a Czech study. Researchers discovered that men with brown eyes also typically had "bigger mouths, broader chins, bigger noses and more prominent eyebrows" than their blue-eyed brethren.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Air Force's sequestration hit would mean less of everything
Air Force commanders will get orders in the next few days to plan for the possibility of fewer flying hours, providing fewer office supplies and working on fewer IT upgrades. Part of the service's planning will be to figure out how many civilian workers would need to be furloughed and for how long.
Hitting the debt limit: What bills would be paid?
Now that there's a fresh showdown, the possibility of Social Security cuts - and more - is back on the table. The government could run out of cash to pay all its bills in full as early as Feb. 15, according to one authoritative estimate, and congressional Republicans want significant spending cuts in exchange for raising the borrowing limit. Obama, forced to negotiate an increase in 2011, has pledged not to negotiate again.
Historic buildings throw wrench in agencies real-property efforts
Managing the government's 400,000-strong portfolio of federal properties has vexed agencies for years. And the long-documented problems are only compounded when the properties in question are historical landmarks.