Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Analysis: In sequester, managers should start planning for workforce reductions
Thursday - 5/10/2012, 10:26am EDT
Bell, the senior policy director of the Bipartisan Policy Center, said both President Barack Obama and the House have put forth plans to avoid the $1.2 trillion in cuts over the next decade.
However, those plans are more symbolic than practical.
"Those two parties have been able to now put on the table for messaging and political purposes, 'It's not our fault if the sequester happens.' This is kind of protecting yourself, to be polite about it, but it's not going to become law," Bell said in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Emily Kopp.
Agencies also are not getting any guidance from the Office of Management and Budget about how to prepare for a potential sequestration. OMB Controller Danny Werfel testified before the House Budget Committee last month saying it was "premature" to begin planning for the cuts.
The lack of guidance is leaving agency heads "trying to figure it out on their own," Bell said.
If the automatic cuts do go into effect, agencies that don't have many procurement contracts will be hit hardest, he said. Agencies such as the Treasury Department — with most of its costs coming from personnel, operations and maintenance — will most likely have to turn their attention to workforce reductions in order to cut costs.
"We don't expect the sequestration in any way to be dealt with, waived, delayed enhanced in any way until after the November elections," Bell said. "That means a prudent manager is saying, 'Well, what am I going to do when this opening occurs in June? Am I going to fill that spot?'"
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO